One of the most valuable methods of delay analysis is As-Built But For, also known as the Collapsed As-Built method. Delay Expert, Andrew McKenna details the pros and cons of the method.

Concurrent delay in extension of time claims occurs when multiple delay events happen simultaneously or overlap on a construction project, impacting the critical path. They can be complex and the services of a Delay Expert can prove effective.

While the term "negative float" has become standard in scheduling jargon, it is a misnomer that oversimplifies a complex issue.

In the midst of grappling with the intricacies of drafting a construction claim, two pivotal components demand our attention - Global Claims and Contemporaneous Records.

As populations grow, the demand for quality healthcare facilities becomes increasingly urgent. Hospitals must be designed and constructed to serve the public for years to come, with the flexibility to adapt to emerging healthcare needs.

The words planning and programming are often used interchangeably to describe two distinct functions of project management.

When reviewing which type of delay analysis is most important for a specific case, it’s worth considering the pros and cons of the most commonly accepted methodologies. One of the most popularly used methods is time impact analysis.

Impacted As-Planned is a prospective methodology that relies on impacting the originally planned sequence of works with the delay event.

Claims advisory services are here to keep your projects on track, providing the expertise needed to navigate disputes effectively. 

The Zweite M/S “Philippa Schulte” Shipping GmbH v PSA Corp Ltd [2012] SGHC 135 case highlights essential lessons for Delay Experts and Quantity Surveyors.

Delays are a common challenge in construction projects, often leading to disputes, financial losses, and strained relationships between stakeholders.

Managing delays in complex projects requires a proactive approach, robust planning, and effective communication.

Some delay analysis reports looks impressive but that’s all they do. Delay expert Andrew McKenna looks into two key cases and explores why delay analysis needs to match reality.

In construction disputes, expert witnesses play a crucial role in presenting evidence and analysis to support claims related to project delays.

To effectively manage and resolve these issues, it's crucial to establish a clear causal link between the cause of a problem and its effect on the project.

Accura Consulting was engaged to provide claims consultancy services for a major urban rail tunnel project in Australia that encountered significant challenges related to delays, cost escalations, and complex contractual obligations.

The construction industry, a cornerstone of economic growth, is facing a troubling surge in disputes. In Australia, disputes are particularly acute in large infrastructure projects, especially in energy and tunneling, where complexities and cost overruns often lead to contention.

Forensic quantity surveyors can support claims preparation in their role as dirty experts, diving deep into the details and collaborating with lawyers to assemble and analyse evidence that forms the foundation of a robust claim.

Disruption claims provide a pathway for contractors to recover losses caused by inefficiencies on a project. For such claims to succeed, they must adhere to the "common-sense" approach.

Accura Consulting was engaged to conduct a comprehensive cost escalation analysis for a major road infrastructure project that faced significant financial challenges because of the COVID-19 pandemic.