Why Lawyers Should Encourage Early Engagement of Delay Experts
Construction disputes are often won or lost long before a formal claim is prepared.
The quality of project records, the structure of the baseline programme, and the way delay events are identified and documented during project delivery frequently determine the strength of any future entitlement.
For that reason, early engagement of delay experts should not be viewed solely as a project controls exercise. It is equally a risk management and dispute avoidance measure.
While delay experts are commonly instructed once disputes emerge, there is significant value in involving them during project planning and mobilisation. Their involvement can help establish the evidentiary foundations upon which future extension of time claims, prolongation claims and delay defences may ultimately depend.
The Importance of the Baseline Programme
Courts and tribunals routinely look to the baseline programme as the starting point for assessing delay.
A well-constructed baseline programme provides a contemporaneous record of how the works were intended to be delivered, the sequence of activities, resource assumptions and completion strategy. Without it, demonstrating the impact of subsequent delay events becomes significantly more difficult.
Early engagement of a delay expert can assist in ensuring that the programme is logically linked, contractually compliant and capable of supporting future forensic analysis if required.
This becomes particularly important where disputes later arise concerning critical path impacts, concurrency, extensions of time or liquidated damages.
Identifying Risks Before They Become Claims
Many delay disputes originate from risks that were visible from the outset.
Unrealistic completion dates, procurement constraints, interface risks, labour shortages and weather-sensitive activities can all create vulnerabilities within a programme. Delay experts are uniquely positioned to identify these issues and assess their potential impact on project completion.
From a legal perspective, understanding these risks early allows project participants to consider appropriate contractual mechanisms, risk allocation strategies and record-keeping processes before problems arise.
Supporting Contract Administration
Most standard form contracts impose strict obligations relating to delay notices, programme updates and extension of time claims.
Failure to comply with these provisions can prejudice entitlement, regardless of the underlying merits of the claim.
By engaging delay experts early, project teams can establish reporting processes that align with contractual requirements and create a contemporaneous record of delay events as they occur. This frequently reduces disputes regarding notice compliance and entitlement later in the project.
Creating Better Evidence
When disputes reach adjudication, arbitration or litigation, delay analysis is only as strong as the records supporting it.
The courts have repeatedly emphasised the importance of contemporaneous evidence when assessing delay. Decisions such as White Constructions Pty Ltd v PBS Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1166 and V601 Developments Pty Ltd v Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 849 demonstrate the judiciary's preference for analyses grounded in actual project records rather than theoretical models.
Early involvement of delay experts can help establish the programme management, record-keeping and reporting practices necessary to support future forensic analysis.
Reducing the Scope of Future Disputes
Perhaps the greatest benefit of early engagement is that it often narrows disputes before they arise.
Where parties maintain accurate programmes, identify delay events contemporaneously and preserve relevant records, many areas of disagreement can be resolved without formal proceedings. Even where disputes remain, the issues are typically more focused and capable of objective analysis.
For lawyers advising clients on major projects, the engagement of a delay expert should therefore be viewed as more than a project management decision. It is an investment in preserving evidence, protecting contractual rights and strengthening any future position should a dispute arise.
Conclusion
Delay experts are often instructed after problems emerge. By that stage, opportunities to improve programmes, capture evidence and manage risk have frequently been lost.
Early engagement helps create robust baseline programmes, supports contractual compliance, improves record keeping and strengthens the evidentiary foundation of future claims and defences.
For lawyers involved in construction projects, it is one of the most effective steps available to reduce dispute risk while improving the quality of any claim that may ultimately need to be advanced or defended.
At Accura Consulting, our team of experts work with clients to create a tailored solution to problems. If you have an issue and want expert support, get in touch.
Back to News and Insights
Related News and
Insights from Accura
