How to Use Quantum and Delay Experts to Avoid Global Claims

Claims ConsultingQuantum ExpertsDelay Experts

3 May

In this on demand presentation Andrew McKenna and Paul McArd discuss what a global claim is and how they can be avoided by using quantum and delay experts.

Paul and Andrew provide practical examples of global and non global delay claims and detail how to quantify prolongation costs on a non global basis.

Disclaimer: This video does not in any way constitute any type of legal or professional advice whatsoever and in no way should be relied upon by any party whatsoever in any jurisdiction.

Back to News and Insights

Related News and
Insights from Accura

Featured

What Form of Delay Analysis is Most Supported in Australia?

When faced with a construction delay, you may wonder what form of delay analysis is most supported in Australia: prospective or retrospective? Any delay expert worth securing knows where recent judgments sit.

Experience is Not Evidence: The Quantum Lesson from Santos v Fluor

Experience isn't evidence. Santos v Fluor shows why an effective quantum expert witness needs more than industry experience. Courts expect transparent methodology, construction costing expertise and evidence that withstands scrutiny.

Exploring Global / Total Loss Claims

Claims for prolongation costs are challenging because entitlement and quantification are rarely the sole matters in dispute. For delay experts and quantum experts, analysis and reports need more.

Rejected Baselines and Continuing Obligations

A widespread misconception in construction project controls holds that a programme has no value until formally approved by the Engineer, Project Manager, or Employer. For forensic delay experts, this is one of the key spaces delays begin.

Paul McArd

Paul Mcard

How to Use Quantum and Delay Experts to Avoid Global Claims

Related News and Insights from Accura

Prolongation Costs – A Non Global Approach

Delay Analysis – A Common Sense Approach

Related News and
Insights from Accura